Concerned Consumer or Mentally Ill?

Today I was going to write a post about local Florida seafood that I recently cooked with Black Box wine to go over some great gluten free pasta that I recently discovered. But as I was perusing the morning headlines, I came across this article that states having a passion for food quality or worrying about what you eat could indicate a “severe psychological disorder”, an eating disorder called orthorexia.
This article is written by Amelia Hill who is an education reporter for The Observer. She states that those who have this disease are people who “… are solely concerned with the quality of the food they put in their bodies…Refusing to touch sugar, salt, caffeine, alcohol, wheat, gluten, yeast, soya, corn and dairy foods is just the start of their diet restrictions. Any foods that have come into contact with pesticides, herbicides or contain artificial additives are also out.”
That last sentence just really stuns me…are we that far gone in society that articles like this can be written and published in a major news journal? Wow. I mean isn’t avoiding harmful ingredients, or ingredients that we are allergic/sensitive to a GOOD thing? Shouldn’t we be concerned about the food we put into our bodies, where it comes from and to avoid those foods that we know to have pesticides, herbicides and artificial additives???? I would think yes, but I suppose, as is evidenced by my blog where I discuss so much about eating local, organic when you can, avoiding harmful additives and GMO foods, that I must have this so called disorder, according to Ms. Hill.
Apparently this disorder affects people mostly commonly over the age of 30, who are “ middle-class, well-educated people who read about food scares in the papers, research them on the internet, and have the time and money to source what they believe to be purer alternatives”. HUH. Well in that case most of the food bloggers and real life people I know also have this disorder. Interesting that this disease is commonly found in people that are educated about food and are demanding better food for themselves and their family. Now, rather than a force to be reckoned with, we are being reduced to people with an eating disorder. The article also attacks nutritionists, dietitians and naturopaths “who believe in curing problems through entirely natural methods” who are our allies in the fight for better food.
When you look at the Wikipedia information on orthorexia nervosa , Dr. Steven Bratman, an MD, coined this disorder to describe people that take healthy eating to the level of obsession where they actually become malnourished in the process. It goes on to describe subjects that avoid certain foods, like fats, animal products, or other ingredients considered to be “unhealthy” by the subject, severely restricting their diet to sometimes only a few foods. Improperly managed diets like this can lead to starvation. That is what this disorder is all about. This is very sad and also very different from the light that Ms. Hill paints it in her article. An article that is going out to subscribers of this newspaper world wide. Most of whom will only skim it, and get the wrong idea.
Reading an article like this, that has been published in a major newspaper which reaches millions of people is scary to me, in a who is backing this and why kind of way. Perhaps it is a backlash to movies like Food Inc. or King Corn . Or maybe it is a response to Michael Pollan or Nina Planck and their writings which have become so popular lately, showing the food industry that the quality of our food is a concern for many, many people these days. Articles like this fly in the face of the entire organic, natural foods and slow food movements that have been gaining a lot of political power in the past few years, making them out to be a bunch of crazy people. These movements have been hugely successful, already putting a big wrench in the corn industry by forcing them to reduce products containing corn syrup. The same way, a few years before, that the public put a major halt in the production of hydrogenated oils and the prominence of them in our food.
These are both examples of something the public educated themselves on, and then voted with their wallets, again a sign that Ms. Hill says could mean you have this eating disorder. An article like this just serves to spread misinformation to readers while patting the backs of the food industry that keeps putting crap in our food, allowing the cycle to continue. This point of view basically says that eating McDonald’s, pre-packaged foods full of chemicals, or fruits laden with pesticides and not worrying about what it does to your body is a “healthier” way to look at things than going to the farmers market or sourcing your own better produced food alternatives because you are concerned about where your food is coming from. Not only is it healthier, but if you don’t think this way, you have a severe psychological disorder.
The author notes that for some people, “eating becomes so stressful their personal relationships can come under pressure and they become socially isolated.” Granted, when I worked for a holistic doctor, I did see some people who were overly concerned about food and what they didn’t eat. Some took it to an extreme measure. However, the way this article is written, by including pesticides and chemical additives or common allergens like dairy, gluten or soy, as examples for what people with this disorder might exclude from their diets, is lumping a whole lot of people into a group of people with mental disorders, that have no business being there. This article looks like a cheap attempt to discredit all the legitimate concerns that many of us have been raising over the past few years, by lumping us, and those health care providers that use non-invasive practices, into the same basket as those who do unfortunately suffer from mental illness.
The author quotes Deanne Jade, founder of the National Centre for Eating Disorders for saying: “modern society has lost its way with food”. Articles like this prove that could very well be so. No wonder newspaper readership is going down.
* food photo courtesy of thebittenword.com’s http://www.flickr.com/photos/galant/





Elle - August 17, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Well, let me get in line to sign up for this “disorder” that Ms. Hill seems to think I suffer from!
God forbid we decide we have minds of our own and decide to use them! This infuriates me. If some groups would have their way, we’d all be eating HFCS and fast food every day. Then we’d all be sick and relying on the big drug companies. Not to “heal us,” but to prolong our agony with their drugs that give you your side effects with a smile and a happy voice on a commercial.
Thanks for bringing our attention to this ridiculous article. I wonder if it was written while pigging out on fast food, then a prescription drug chaser to make it all better?
City Girl - August 17, 2009 at 2:52 pm
What gets to me about articles like that is the complete disservice to everyone – ie people who have food allergies or celiacs who will suffer if they don’t follow their restricted diet AND people who have orthorexia, which is so misunderstood.
Right now, I am on a restricted diet (because of several health problems, at least two of which have roots in food allergies) to isolate food allergies and improve my health. My naturopath really emphasized organic foods as well. I pack food all the time so as to avoid having to eat out. Most of my social activities no longer have to do with eating out unless it’s at a handful of restaurants where my food restrictions can be accommodated.
All that said, I am going to a wedding on Saturday, and yes, I will snack beforehand, but am fully planning to eat whatever I can at the wedding and am not going to worry about whether it all accommodates my restricted diet – ie I will stay away from dairy and wheat (no wedding cake for me), but if the veggies on the veggie platter are not organic, I am still going to eat them.
Thank you for writing this post – I am so glad you did.
City Girl - August 17, 2009 at 2:53 pm
And Elle is so right too.
Jenny @ Nourished Kitchen - August 17, 2009 at 3:02 pm
I’d heard of this “disorder” before too. I bet they’re ready to lock me up:
“Dear God! She eats sprouted grain bread and sauerkraut!”
“Oh no! She only has honey, not sugar in her cupboards! Someone take her child away and give him a poptart!”
It seems so odd that folks adhering to a wholesome diet, in accordance with leading recommendations, would be considered mentally ill. I’d take being labeled an orthorexic any day over eating a plate full of chemicals I can’t even pronounce.
Maria - August 17, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Thanks for posting this. What an article. I didn’t know eating healthy and enjoying good, quality, organic foods was a bad thing. I guess I should get some help for my disorder-maybe the Dr. will prescribe a trip to McDonalds. PLEASE! I try to eat local whenever possible, I don’t eat meat, and try to buy organic produce as well. I don’t think people should be criticized for this. And so many people have food allergies, GI issues, etc. where they can’t eat certain foods. Eating them would make them more sick. Everyone is different and shouldn’t be classified into a certain disorder just because they eat “different” foods or healthy foods. Ok, I will stop now:)
Jill McKeever - August 17, 2009 at 3:09 pm
**APPLAUDING ON MY FEET**
Excellent article, Jenn!! I completely agree with you. It’s terribly sad that such an article could be allowed to make such a wide sweeping generalization and still go to print. We all must be very careful what we read and how much we believe.
And there’s a whole can of worms to reckon with when it comes to comparing availability of fresh foods, education and the financial well-being of us all.
I must be REALLY sick because I want to educate the next generation to rely on backyard/urban gardening as the way to eat. I believe our children’s children will not have access to true fresh foods unless we teach them to grow it themselves.
Mom's Cafe Home Cooking - August 17, 2009 at 3:15 pm
Obviously Ms. Hill must have some type of credentials to diagnose eating disorders? It would appear this new eating disorder is rather widespread as well so perhaps those not with this eating disorder are the ones with the real problem! Reading the article is is clear this eating disorder does not apply to those who are simply concerned about the quality of food they eat and who take extra steps to ensure they have quality food. It appears to apply to those who go overboard.
The article was way too one sided. All you have to do is look at the growing obesity rate to know people are not eating properly yet anyone restricting their food intake for any reason may have an eating disorder? Honestly!
I suppose according to her standards I have this disorder because I do as much home growing and home preserving as possible. Those preservatives are not just quietly sitting in your body after ingesting them so less is better. The artificial colours and flavourings are another issue. Eating organic makes sense when it prevents more damaging chemicals from causing further health problems. We’ve eaten like this for decades way before avoiding harmful food substances was even popular. We raised our kids this way. All are happy, healthy, well adjusted with no weight issues.
Jenn - August 17, 2009 at 3:18 pm
I guess I some inkling of this so-called disorder. I still like several processed foods, but I mostly go organic and fresh. I had to laugh at the line “eating becomes so stressful their personal relationships can come under pressure and they become socially isolated.” Really?! In fact, it’s completely the opposite effect for me. It’s actually help better my relationship with others. More and more of my friends have started to eat healthier and become aware of what they put into their bodies at the same time enjoying themselves. And their happy about it.
kat - August 17, 2009 at 3:27 pm
That article is just crazy! I wonder who in the industrial food industry she is working for
ValleyWriter - August 17, 2009 at 3:40 pm
It’s interesting to see other people’s reactions to this article. It appears to me that some seem to feel they are being attacked or labeled in some way – but I just see a really bad article! Perhaps this author or the publication was deliberately skewing the presentation. But it’s also very possible we’re dealing with someone who is uneducated about food issues, has no personal connection to the issue – and is on a tight deadline. These are not the conditions that make for great reporting, but sadly, they are often the case.
I’m not excusing the poor quality of the article; in fact, I agree that this type of writing does a great disservice to many who may read it and take it at face value. I applaud Jenn’s educated and insightful blog post for helping to clear things up!
Pam - August 17, 2009 at 3:59 pm
Hi Jenn,
I tried to send you a personal email but it wouldn’t go through on your contact page.
I was wondering how do I get my name to highlight or whatever you would call it so that people could click on my name and find my blog?
I am logged into my blog when I place comments. Some blogs it works on and some it doesn’t.
Most appreciated,
Pam
courtney - August 17, 2009 at 4:01 pm
I thinks its perfectly normal and smart to be aware of whats thee and how your food is being produced. I am also aware there are numerous people out there with medical conditions and allergies ,we need to be more mindful of. But I have also seen extreme cases of people who can fall into this type of disorder and tend to make eating difficult for themselves and others. Working in rstaurant and catering you see examples of this from time to time. And dont get me started on the socio economic factors with eating healthy nowadays. Its not a black and white issue, but with many shades of gray.
Crystal - August 17, 2009 at 5:39 pm
I think it is sad that people have to worry so much about what is in their food that they would go to this extreme.
I also find that the my pyramid also stresses things that it may not necessarily need to. One example: I personally do not like any milk less than 2% as I feel it is just watered down milk and I can do that myself and pay less. They need to put more stress on eating healthy than what type of milk you drink. People 100 years ago did not have the option of low fat milk, they drank whole milk and were just fine. I think they are compensating for the extra fats that Americans are taking in through other means that are not nearly as healthy. But once they put that out there, people jump on it and say that whole milk is bad – they are even recommending that you offer your child fat-free or low-fat milk, yogurt, and cheese once they reach the age of two! Young children need more fat than adults to help them grow and develop. This may be to combat childhood obesity, but the child that eats healthy and does not eat all the sugary, fatty foods that a lot of kids now days eat will not be getting enough fats if they eat low/no fat dairy. *Rant Over.
Just saying that it isn’t just the media.
Teresa - August 17, 2009 at 7:30 pm
Jenn, I think Elle is so funny. Back to the article, as a writer yourself, you know that some writers (when their readership is down) will create some conflict-issue to write about and gather attention. Whether what they wrote is factual or not (in this case I think NOT), is not necessarily the point. It is merely a way to enrage the readers and get responses. More responses, higher readership, better for the writer. I think what you’re doing is great. Keep writing about real and healthy food, the kind all of us foodies have come to appreciate. This is action versus re-action, which is what I think she wants, so don’t give it to her. You make your point, and you do it very well. With her (or her publisher’s) tactics, she’ll eventually end up in the toilet. Sorry, I just had to rant.
Jen of a2eatwrite - August 17, 2009 at 8:12 pm
This is such a misuse of a real disorder. Just like we say that “everyone” is autistic. Or at least on the autism scale. Try saying that to someone who struggles every day with autism or who is the parent of a severely autistic child.
I wish we’d quit diagnosing others.
Maybe if we all ate pure foods, we’d have less of a need to do all this diagnosis.
Toni - August 17, 2009 at 8:20 pm
I happily have this disorder, along with all the other educated people I know who want their food to be as healthy as possible. As an acupuncturist, I find that most of my patients do NOT have this disorder, and part of my job is to educate them about the value of eating healthy foods.
Keep up the good work, Jenn!
girlichef - August 17, 2009 at 9:02 pm
Huh. Funny (not really) because how many (less-educated..in the way a lot of us are…perhaps) people will read that article and be swayed? I think it is fabulous that you wrote this post and hope that many, MANY people will read it and share it!
Peter G - August 17, 2009 at 9:06 pm
I love your rants Jenn! I suppose I need to put my hand up as well and admit I have this “disorder”! It’s obviously being backed by the major food companies who are worried about their bottom lines. When are they going to realise that we are educated consumers who have choice? In a way, you have to laugh BUT at the same time it seems scary. Keep it up dear Queen!
Cris - August 17, 2009 at 9:15 pm
Bravo Jenn! Long life to healthy habits!
Sam Sotiropoulos - August 17, 2009 at 9:47 pm
Add me to the list of those who suffer from this “malady”! LOL Don’t be too surprised, newspapers rely on advertising monies and you know where those come from…
So, in this particular case, I’m glad I’m “sick”.
Just think what it means that articles like this are starting to appear, we must be threatening the profits of big agribusiness, which IS a good thing! Yay!
Amy Green - Simply Sugar & Gluten-Free - August 17, 2009 at 11:41 pm
I’ve been called worse…Ms. Hill doesn’t bother me one bit.
nina - August 18, 2009 at 3:28 am
Looking at the length of most of these comments, you have certainly struck a nerve!!! I know people who suffer from orthorexia and yes, they are always sick, malnourished, always negative and VERY critical of other people who dare to eat the “wrong” food!! All I know is that they are very lonely people and I will much rather go through life, eating the wrong food, but surrounded by wonderful friends and family!! By this I am not saying we must not make the right choices, but there is a limit!!!A very informative article, Jenn!!
Natasha - 5 Star Foodie - August 18, 2009 at 7:47 am
Well, I guess every concern can go into an obsession. Those psychologists are always trying to categorize everything (I was a psych major in college)
But I see that it is not listed in DSM-IV as an official disease, at least not yet. Very interesting.
Bellini Valli - August 18, 2009 at 7:50 am
The disease is legitimate but the author lumped too many people into this category. If being health conscious and concerned about what we put into our bodies is a bad thing then call me crazy.
Adam - August 18, 2009 at 9:01 am
Excellent work on dissecting the article and you have some great points on there. I think you’re right about this maybe being a backlash attempt on the Pollan and Food Inc. type stuff, and a cheap attempt at best.
I don’t see anything wrong with being educated about something you care about. How else can you make proper choices? It’s your life, and if you want to avoid wheat, dairy, red meat, food with fuzz on it, whatever… you totally can. I think everyone has little quirks and tendencies about food (ever see that kid that can’t have their food touch).
My name is Adam. I don’t eat carbs after 5pm, I try to avoid wheat, and I pack food whenever I am away from home for more than 3 hours. Do I have a problem… even if I do, I’m still a normal cool guy.
Daily Spud - August 18, 2009 at 9:13 am
I saw a couple of responses to the article before reading the original and now, having read it I can see very much where you’re coming from Jenn. While I don’t doubt that the disorder is a real condition and the cause of real stress and suffering, the article didn’t make any attempt to distinguish sufferers from, say, people who have genuine food allergies or to maybe suggest that avoiding pesticides is possibly a good thing. As a subject, it deserves a more balanced and less sensationalist treatment – more along the lines of what you have written here in this post.
Lee - August 18, 2009 at 10:56 am
I agree with many of the comments above. The article referenced is a bad one, and it does a disservice to people who actually have some sort of a medical condition. The sad truth is that many people will read the initial article and nod in agreement – “oh yes, my son came home for Thanksgiving and refused to eat the sugar-free Jell-O, he’s sick!” I applaud the Leftover queen for taking on the topic and for having a sense of humor. I’m proud to have this disorder too!
Jennifer - August 18, 2009 at 10:58 am
The real danger is that article not people making a conscience effort to make healthier food choices. It’s beyond reckless. Thanks for taking a clear look at the facts. Now we have to hope the people who need to read this post do, so here’s a stumble.
lisaiscooking - August 18, 2009 at 10:59 am
I’m curious about Ms. Hill and where she has worked and what inspired this opinion of hers. I have seen people take some eating habits too far for instance in avoiding carbs and therefore eating no vegetables. But, that is very different from being aware of what you are eating and avoiding pesticides and additives.
TasteStopping - August 18, 2009 at 11:41 am
Kurt Vonnegut would have had a field day with this.
Judy - August 18, 2009 at 12:20 pm
I knew it! I knew there was something wrong with me and that if I looked long enough and hard enough I would find it!!! Yay for me though that it is something like this. Crazy article written by someone who really needs to think before they write!
Thanks for pointing this out to me Jenn!
Gavan 'The Healthy Irishman' - August 18, 2009 at 2:20 pm
What an absolute load of bollox. Maybe Mizz Hill is in the pocket of one of these food companies. To try an convince people that making healthy, educated and wise choices about what they consume is deemed a ‘disorder’ is just small minded and ridiculous.It’s amusing if nothing else.
People are way too smart to pay heed to this kind of rubbish.
Nice one Jenn on bringing this to us.
Michelle - August 18, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Hahahahahahah……oh my gosh, this is ALMOST the funniest thing I’ve heard all day! Oh, oh wait! I know! They should consult with the pharmaceutical industry and make a PILL for all of us who have this horrible disorder! Then they call sell it to us for $300 a week, followed by $2000 of other pills to treat the side effects from these pills (and the disorders we develop from eating the CRAP they’re trying to pressure us to eat). Argh. Just one more example of why I despair for humanity.
dawn - August 19, 2009 at 10:44 am
Jenn that was so well written. We are damned if we do and damned if we don’t right?
I chaulk this ALL up to media. All the media wants to do is get as much attention as possible, so they rely on twisting things up a notch.
Whatever happened to the media just reporting the facts, that’s all. Look how far they’ve twisted this story? Seriously.
Fran - August 19, 2009 at 12:21 pm
Jenn, this was my first visit to your blog. What a lovely welcome this article was!
). It’s basic self care, and if everyone did a little more of it, we’d all be better off.
OMG, this makes my head explode. I’m sensitive to MSG/hydrolized veg protien, processed sugar, fake vanilla, and artificial sweetners. (pretty low maintenence otherwise
Haley J. - August 19, 2009 at 1:11 pm
I love it when people call me crazy. Really. This reporter should take me out to lunch, then see what I don’t eat. Am I crazy because I have eliminated high fructose corn syrup from my house? Because I only serve meat once or twice a week? Because I am cutting down on sugar? Because I don’t drink caffeine (anymore, for the past week)? Because “from scratch” is the de facto cooking method at home? Because I bake my own bread?
The fact is, I want to live a long and happy life. I am not socially isolated because of my choices. But then, maybe my friends and also my fellow food bloggers are more a support group.
I hate that sloppy journalism like this is still so rampant when these journalists are complaining about blogging encroaching on their territory. Maybe the masses are looking for alternatives precisely because of drivel like this.
Gah.
Dave - August 19, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Listen up, all of you: Stop reading food labels, stop trying to make your own decisions on what to eat, and stop questioning the statements of People Who Know What’s Good For You.
Now, line up for your Soylent ration, my little sheep.
=)
Marillyn @ just-making-noise - August 19, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Wow! That’s crazy! Thank you for sharing the article and your thoughts! I totally with you. Its all about the money for those big news papers, ugh.
elly - August 20, 2009 at 10:31 am
I guess I have this disorder, too. I’m starting young too, since I haven’t hit 30 yet. Thanks so much for sharing the article (which I don’t agree with) and your thoughts on it (which I do agree with). It’s ridiculous that we should be meant to feel crazy over something like avoiding pesticides and additives.
Cara - August 20, 2009 at 10:39 am
I really can’t do much but laugh about this. It’s all over the place – lumping in people who care about food quality with those who avoid certain alcohol and gluten and with those who are malnourished because they don’t eat enough – it’s ridiculous and none of these things is all-inclusive of the others. I don’t take much offense to this because I personally don’t feel like they are talking about me. Sure I buy local when I can, for some of the reasons given above but also simply because local produce often tastes better. I try to avoid sugar in my diet, not because I read an article that scared me into it, but because I’ve learned my own body’s tolerance for carbs, and I’m just one of those higher-protein-and-good-fats kinda gals. And I’ll even admit that once in a while my food preferences are socially isolating and it can be difficult to work around. And yet, I just feel these are my “quirks” and that I certainly don’t fit into the entire description they are talking about here. In fact, I don’t think I know anyone who does!
Alta - August 20, 2009 at 12:07 pm
I have this disorder as well, apparently! Nevermind that I actually have gluten intolerances, and choose to know what is in my food before I place it in my mouth. It does bother me that this article went to print. There is already so much of a “one-size-fits-all” mentality this day in age when it relates to food, diets, and health, and this “diagnosis” is more of that same trend. I’m sure there are people in this world that obsess over their diet to the point where their quality of life suffers, but the description as this writer gives it is incredibly poor and misleading.
Thanks for sharing, and letting all of us rant about it!
blogcho - August 22, 2009 at 7:40 am
Waw!!! I just read that, and can’t believe what this Ms.Hill has written. If I have this eating disorder, than most of the people in my home town are ill too XD
kellypea - August 23, 2009 at 12:08 pm
As I read this I kept wanting to “look at the cover.” You know, like, is this for real? Is it fiction? Is it from a credible source? Because it’s a bit ridiculous. I say everything in moderation is good, and definitely educating people about what they may not know is even better since that’s how things can change for the better. It sounds like the person wanted a reaction to her sensational statements.
Arlene - August 24, 2009 at 9:21 pm
Well, the author’s apparent lack of good judgement speaks for itself. Her comments sound like an extremist rant that no clear thinking person could take at all serious.
giz - August 26, 2009 at 8:28 pm
Interestingly, the first thing that popped into my mind is “who’s paying her salary”?